Fifteen thousand seven hundred
The number is the count of invisible operations.
Since late 2022, surveillance actors have sent more than 15,700 tracking queries through the global mobile signaling network, targeting individuals across multiple countries using telecom infrastructure that appears — to every network it touches — to be legitimate roaming traffic. The targets' phones displayed no notification. Their message logs recorded no event. The tracking was invisible at the device layer because it operated at the signaling layer beneath it.
The Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto published the findings on April 23, 2026, in a report titled "Bad Connection," authored by Gary Miller and Swantje Lange. The report documents two distinct surveillance campaigns, names three telecom entities whose infrastructure served as the gateway, and identifies the structural property that makes these campaigns possible: the global telecom interconnection system is built on a trust model that was never designed to verify whether signaling traffic is what it claims to be.
The ghost operators
The three named entities are not intelligence agencies. They are not traditional surveillance vendors. They are telecom companies with legitimate licenses.
019Mobile is a privately owned Israeli mobile virtual network operator that brands itself as Telzar 019. It operates its own core network on Partner Communications' radio access network. The Haaretz investigation that followed Citizen Lab's publication — headlined "Ghost Operators: How Israeli Telecoms Were Exploited to Track Citizens Worldwide" — documented dozens of tracking attempts routed through 019Mobile's infrastructure. The company's head of IT and security stated that "no risk to our customers has been identified" and could not confirm the infrastructure belonged to 019Mobile.
Tango Networks UK is a British MVNO, a subsidiary of Texas-headquartered Tango Networks Inc. It was assigned UK Mobile Network Code 53 by Ofcom in 2022. It was used "over several years for surveillance activities," per Citizen Lab. The company declined to comment.
Airtel Jersey is a Channel Islands operator now owned by Sure, itself part of Beyon Group, which is partially owned by the Kingdom of Bahrain. Sure's CEO stated the company "does not lease access to signalling directly or knowingly to organisations for locating or tracking individuals."
None of these entities is a surveillance company on paper. Each holds a legitimate telecom license. Each passed whatever regulatory scrutiny exists in its jurisdiction. The "ghost operator" designation comes from their function: real companies whose infrastructure is used — knowingly or otherwise — as a trusted entry point for surveillance traffic that the target network accepts because it appears to come from a legitimate peer.
Campaign one: the rotating identity
The first campaign exploited both SS7 and Diameter protocols with coordinated alternating access. When SS7 queries were blocked by a target network's firewall, the system automatically switched to Diameter. When Diameter was blocked, it fell back to SS7.
The surveillance traffic rotated through 11 operator identities across ten countries. The countries whose operator identities were spoofed include Cambodia, China, Israel, Italy, Liechtenstein, Morocco, Poland, Switzerland, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. Three distinct routing patterns were used to disguise the true origin: direct access through Tango Networks UK into the BICS IPX network, direct access through 019Mobile into the Comfone IPX, and a spoofed identity path combining AIS Thailand hostnames with China Unicom network realm identifiers routed through 019Mobile into the Syniverse IPX.
The IPX — the IP Packet Exchange — is the interconnection fabric through which international roaming traffic flows. Companies like BICS, Comfone, and Syniverse operate the IPX networks. Ghost operators inject surveillance traffic into these networks, which route it to target operators as though it were legitimate roaming queries. The IPX providers do not necessarily verify whether the traffic passing through them is genuinely roaming-related.
Citizen Lab researcher Gary Miller assessed the vendor behind Campaign One as "likely an Israeli-based commercial geo-intelligence provider" with possible connections to Circles, Cognyte, and Rayzone.
Campaign two: the invisible command
The second campaign was qualitatively different. It did not query the network for the target's location. It commanded the target's SIM card to report it.
The technique is known as SIMjacker, first documented in 2019 by Cathal Mc Daid at AdaptiveMobile Security. It exploits the S@T Browser application embedded in SIM cards — a legacy component designed to allow mobile operators to send service messages to handsets. The attack sends a specially formatted binary SMS to the target's SIM card. The SIM processes the command without displaying any notification to the user, without recording any event in the message log, and without requiring any interaction. The SIM card then responds with the phone's location data.
Citizen Lab documented more than 15,700 such tracking attempts since late 2022. From a single Global Title — a signaling identifier — more than 1,700 privacy attacks were recorded between October 2023 and April 2025. Ninety-two percent of the traffic from that identifier was linked to location tracking.
The SIMjacker attack surface is the SIM card itself. It does not require internet access. It does not require app installation. It does not require user interaction. It requires only that the target has a SIM card in a phone connected to any mobile network. Every phone with a SIM card is in the attack surface, not by misconfiguration but by design.
What the user cannot do
The structural finding is that the target of SS7, Diameter, or SIMjacker surveillance cannot mitigate the risk through their own actions.
Using a VPN does not help. The attack operates at the signaling layer below the IP stack. The VPN encrypts data traffic; the signaling traffic that reports location is separate from data traffic and is invisible to the VPN.
Using encrypted messaging does not help. Signal, WhatsApp, and Matrix protect message content. SS7 and SIMjacker attacks do not access content. They extract location. The encryption is irrelevant because the attack does not interact with the data layer.
Switching phones does not help. The attack targets the SIM card and the phone number, not the handset.
Using a privacy-focused browser does not help. The attack does not interact with the browser, the operating system, or any application.
The only user-side mitigation is removing the SIM card entirely — which eliminates cellular connectivity and is not a practical defense for the billions of people who depend on mobile phones.
The architectural lesson: when the attack surface is the carrier layer itself, the defense must operate outside that layer.
The protocol that was supposed to fix this
Diameter was designed in the 2000s as the replacement for SS7, specifically to address the security weaknesses that make signaling-layer attacks possible. Diameter includes authentication mechanisms, encryption capabilities, and access controls that SS7 lacks.
Citizen Lab's finding is that operators have "largely failed to implement" these protections. The Diameter deployment across 4G and 5G networks continues to rely on the same peer-to-peer trust model that makes SS7 vulnerable. The operators who built the new network imported the old trust model.
This means the migration from 3G to 4G to 5G — the infrastructure upgrade that was supposed to close the signaling vulnerability — has not closed it. The protocols changed. The trust model did not. The ghost operators exploit the trust model, not the protocol.
The GSMA, the global standards body for mobile operators, published a Code of Conduct for Global Title Leasing two years before Citizen Lab's report. The Code is voluntary. Citizen Lab found it has "no meaningful signatories."
The spyware parallel
In the same month Citizen Lab published "Bad Connection," the spyware ecosystem continued its own pattern of intermediary-layer exploitation.
On May 22, DHS told NPR that ICE has "no relationship" with Paragon Solutions, the Israeli commercial spyware maker whose Graphite tool can remotely infiltrate devices and access encrypted messages without the target clicking a link. But DHS declined to clarify whether ICE can still access Paragon-developed tools through a third party. The Paragon contract was listed as "closed out" on January 20 in federal procurement records. But it had been reactivated once before — in August 2024 under the Trump administration — after a prior pause.
ICE's acting director Todd Lyons acknowledged in an April 1 letter that he approved the use of "cutting-edge technological tools" for counterterrorism and fentanyl enforcement. DHS's statement — "ICE has no relationship with Paragon Solutions, Inc. or with the company that acquired them" — is carefully worded to address the direct contract while leaving third-party access unaddressed.
The ghost operator pattern and the spyware procurement pattern share a structural property: legitimate-looking entities serving as intermediaries for surveillance capabilities that the end target cannot detect, cannot block, and was never told about. The ghost telco routes tracking queries through the signaling network. The spyware vendor routes access through a contractual intermediary. In both cases, the intermediary layer is the attack surface.
What the signaling network sees
The global mobile signaling network — the SS7 and Diameter infrastructure that connects every mobile operator in the world — processes these surveillance queries as routine roaming traffic. When a phone travels from one network to another, the visited network sends signaling messages to the home network to authenticate the subscriber and route calls. This is the legitimate function of the signaling system.
Ghost operators inject queries that look identical to legitimate roaming queries. The network cannot distinguish between a legitimate roaming authentication and a surveillance query disguised as one. The trust model assumes that every entity with signaling access is a legitimate operator with a legitimate operational need to query another network's subscribers.
The number of entities with signaling access is large and growing. Every mobile operator, every MVNO, and every signaling hub that connects to the IPX network can potentially inject queries. The attack surface expands with every new entity that gains signaling access. The GSMA's voluntary Code of Conduct has not constrained this expansion.
The architectural response
The defense against signaling-layer surveillance is the same defense this publication has documented against carrier-layer censorship, mandatory-platform breaches, and server-side tracking: operate outside the intermediary layer.
Mesh networking that does not require a SIM card. Peer-to-peer overlays that do not route through the carrier's signaling infrastructure. Satellite transport that bypasses the mobile network entirely. Wi-Fi-based communication that does not interact with the SS7/Diameter system.
Briar communicates over Bluetooth and Wi-Fi without cellular connectivity. Meshtastic builds mesh networks on LoRa radios. Reticulum provides cryptographic networking independent of the carrier layer. URnetwork's peer-to-peer overlay abstracts transport from the carrier.
None of these tools require a SIM card. None are visible to the signaling network. None can be tracked through SS7 or SIMjacker because they do not traverse the infrastructure those systems monitor.
The 15,700 tracking attempts documented by Citizen Lab operated through the carrier layer. The transports that operate outside it were invisible to every one of them.
The trust model is the vulnerability
The conclusion is structural, not technical.
SS7's lack of authentication is a 1970s design choice that persists because the cost of replacing it exceeds any individual operator's incentive to act. Diameter's unenforced security controls are a 2000s design that operators declined to implement because the trust model was already in place. The GSMA's voluntary Code of Conduct is a 2020s response that operators declined to sign because the consequences of non-compliance are zero.
The ghost operators exploit a trust model that has been documented as vulnerable for over a decade, that has been the subject of multiple Citizen Lab reports since 2018, that has been flagged by the GSMA's own working groups, and that remains structurally unchanged. The vulnerability persists not because it is unknown but because fixing it would require every operator in the global network to enforce authentication at the signaling layer — a coordination problem that no single actor can solve and no regulatory body has the authority to mandate.
Fifteen thousand seven hundred tracking attempts. No notification on any target's phone. No trace in any message log. No defense available to any target through any action they could take. The signaling infrastructure that connects every mobile call in the world is the surveillance infrastructure. The trust model that makes the network function is the trust model that makes the surveillance function.
The architecture that operates outside that trust model is the architecture that is not in the attack surface.
URnetwork is a peer-to-peer overlay for censorship-resistant transport. The URnetwork overlay does not route through the SS7 or Diameter signaling infrastructure. It does not require a SIM card. It is not visible to the signaling network the ghost operators exploit.
https://ur.io
References (8 sources)
References
- Citizen Lab: Bad Connection
- TechCrunch: Surveillance vendors caught abusing access to telcos
- Haaretz: Ghost Operators
- Commsrisk: Investigation Shows Telcos Enable Spying
- CyberScoop: Surveillance campaigns exploit telecom vulnerabilities
- NPR: DHS says ICE has no relationship with Paragon
- NPR: What we know about US government spyware
- GBlock: Surveillance vendors tracking phones through carrier networks